Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238485›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Link Prediction with Continuous-Time Classical and Quantum Walks.

Mark Goldsmith, Harto Saarinen, Guillermo García-Pérez, Joonas Malmi, Matteo A C Rossi, Sabrina Maniscalco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Disease gene prioritization with quantum walks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark GoldsmithAlgorithmiq Ltd., Kanavakatu 3 C, FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland.
Harto SaarinenAlgorithmiq Ltd., Kanavakatu 3 C, FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland.
Guillermo García-PérezAlgorithmiq Ltd., Kanavakatu 3 C, FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland.
Joonas MalmiAlgorithmiq Ltd., Kanavakatu 3 C, FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland.
Matteo A C RossiAlgorithmiq Ltd., Kanavakatu 3 C, FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4665-9284
Sabrina ManiscalcoAlgorithmiq Ltd., Kanavakatu 3 C, FI-00160 Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland 336810Academy of Finland 336814Academy of Finland 341985Emmy.network NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks consist of the physical and/or functional interactions between the proteins of an organism, and they form the basis for the field of network medicine. Since the biophysical and high-throughput methods used to form PPI networks are expensive, time-consuming, and often contain inaccuracies, the resulting networks are usually incomplete. In order to infer missing interactions in these networks, we propose a novel class of link prediction methods based on continuous-time classical and quantum walks. In the case of quantum walks, we examine the usage of both the network adjacency and Laplacian matrices for specifying the walk dynamics. We define a score function based on the corresponding transition probabilities and perform tests on six real-world PPI datasets. Our results show that continuous-time classical random walks and quantum walks using the network adjacency matrix can successfully predict missing protein-protein interactions, with performance rivalling the state-of-the-art.

Indexed as

link predictionprotein–protein interaction networksquantum walksrandom walks

Identifiers

PMID37238485
PMCPMC10217120
OpenAlexW4367298031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.