Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238428›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Redefining Neurodevelopmental Impairment: Perspectives of Very Preterm Birth Stakeholders.

Anne Synnes, Amarpreet Chera, Lindsay L Richter, Jeffrey N Bone, Claude Julie Bourque, Sofia Zhang-Jiang, Rebecca Pearce, Annie Janvier, Thuy Mai Luu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. School outcomes after HIE: a population-based cohort study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025
    Article
  4. Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne SynnesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia and BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Amarpreet CheraDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-5063-2266
Lindsay L RichterDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Jeffrey N BoneBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Claude Julie BourqueCHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9407-0872
Sofia Zhang-JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Rebecca PearceScience and Mathematics Education Research Group, Faculty of Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Annie JanvierDepartment of Pediatrics, Bureau de l'Éthique Clinique (BEC), Université de Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Thuy Mai LuuDepartment of Pediatrics, Université de Montréal, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC H3T 1C5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2222-186X

Funding

CIHR SCA-145104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children born very preterm are at risk of severe neurodevelopmental impairment, a composite endpoint that includes cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and hearing and visual impairment defined by medical professionals. We aimed to describe preterm birth stakeholders' perspectives on this classification. Ten clinical scenarios describing 18-month-old children with different components of severe neurodevelopmental impairment and one scenario of a typically developing child (control) were distributed to parents and stakeholders using a snowball sampling technique. For each scenario, participants rated health on a scale from 0 to 10 and whether the scenario represented a severe condition. Results were analyzed descriptively and mean differences from the control scenario were compared using a linear mixed-effects model. Stakeholders (number = 827) completed 4553 scenarios. Median health scores for each scenario varied from 6 to 10. The rating for the cerebral palsy and language delay scenario was significantly lower (mean difference -4.3; 95% confidence interval: -4.4, -4.1) than the control. The proportion of respondents rating a scenario as "severe" ranged from 5% for cognitive delay to 55% for cerebral palsy and language delay. Most participants disagreed with the rating used in research to describe severe neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm children. The term should be redefined to align with stakeholder perceptions.

Indexed as

neurodevelopmentoutcomespatient-oriented researchprematuritystakeholders

Identifiers

PMID37238428
PMCPMC10217698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.