Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238406›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Development of a Screening Tool for Childcare Professionals to Detect and Refer Infant and Toddler Maltreatment and Trauma: A Tale of Four Countries.

Elisa Bisagno, Alessia Cadamuro, Dierickx Serafine, Bou Mosleh Dima, Groenen Anne, Linde-Ozola Zane, Kandāte Annija, Varga-Sabján Dóra, Morva Dorottya, László Noémi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Elisa BisagnoDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2109-7652
Alessia CadamuroDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-2348
Dierickx SerafineExpertise Centre Resilient People, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg (UCLL), 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-8919
Bou Mosleh DimaExpertise Centre Resilient People, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg (UCLL), 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Groenen AnneExpertise Centre Resilient People, University Colleges Leuven-Limburg (UCLL), 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Linde-Ozola ZaneDepartment of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-0987-8851
Kandāte AnnijaCenter Dardedze, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0005-8924-9869
Varga-Sabján DóraPressley Ridge Hungary Foundation, 1142 Budapest, Hungary.
Morva DorottyaPressley Ridge Hungary Foundation, 1142 Budapest, Hungary.
László NoémiPressley Ridge Hungary Foundation, 1142 Budapest, Hungary.
Rozsa MonikaPressley Ridge Hungary Foundation, 1142 Budapest, Hungary.
Gruber AndreaPressley Ridge Hungary Foundation, 1142 Budapest, Hungary.
De Fazio Giovanna LauraDepartment of Law, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3412-3784
Blom Johanna Maria CatharinaDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-1964

Funding

Rights, Equality and Citizenship (REC) Programme of the European Union 101005642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child maltreatment is considered a pressing social question, compromising the present and future mental and physical health of one in four children in Europe. While children younger than three years of age are especially vulnerable, few screening instruments are available for the detection of risk in this age group. The purpose of this research was to develop a screening tool for childcare professionals working in public and private daycare settings to support them in the early identification and referral of infants and toddlers exposed to emotional and physical abuse and neglect by primary caregivers, to be used in different settings across four European countries: Belgium, Italy, Latvia, and Hungary.

methodA stratified process was used to create the screening tool: We started by using Living lab methodology to co-create the screening tool with its final users, which was followed by testing the tool with a total of 120 childcare professionals from the four participating countries.

resultsDuring the Living Lab phase, a screening tool with three layers was developed. The initial layer includes five "red flags" that signal particular concern and require immediate action. The second layer is a quick screener with twelve items focused on four areas: neglect of basic needs, delays in development, unusual behaviors, and interaction with caregivers. The third layer is an in-depth questionnaire that aids in formalizing a thorough observation of twenty-five items within the same four areas as the quick screener. After a one-day training session, 120 childcare professionals caring for children aged 0-3 from four countries assessed the screening tool and their overall training experience. Childcare professionals reported great satisfaction with the three-layered structure, which made the tool versatile, and agreed on its content, which was considered helpful in the daycare setting for the regular evaluation of the behavior of children and their primary caregivers, thus improving the early observation of change from the normal behavior of the infant or toddler.

conclusionThe three-layered screening tool was reported as feasible, practical, and with great content validity by childcare professionals working in four European countries.

Indexed as

0–3 age groupchild abusechildcare professionalsmaltreatment detectionthree-layered screening tool

Identifiers

PMID37238406
PMCPMC10217277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.