Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238362›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Know Pain, No Pain? Preliminary Testing and Application of a New Tool to Assess Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts in Children.

Linda Wickering, Catherina Lautwein, Hanna Nitsche, Michael Schneider, Tanja Hechler

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring Adolescents' Understanding, Experiences and Beliefs About Pain: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda WickeringDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
Catherina LautweinDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
Hanna NitscheDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
Michael SchneiderDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
Tanja HechlerDepartment of Clinical Psychology for Children and Adolescents, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To deliver tailored pain science education, assessing children's biopsychosocial pain concepts is necessary. As validated tools are lacking, a new tool is presented, the biopsychosocial pain concept matrix (BiPS matrix), which assesses children's biological, psychological, and social pain concepts in five domains according to the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (Hagger and Orbell, 2003): (1) illness identity, (2) causes, (3) consequences, (4) duration, and (5) treatment. The present preliminary study aims to (1) assess the items' readability and understandability in cognitive interviews with

Indexed as

biopsychosocialchronic paincognitive interviewpain conceptpain science educationpain treatmentpediatric painquestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID37238362
PMCPMC10217370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.