Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238259›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Utilizing Envelope Analysis of a Nasal Pressure Signal for Sleep Apnea Severity Estimation.

Mikke Varis, Tuomas Karhu, Timo Leppänen, Sami Nikkonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikke VarisDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Canthia, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-740X
Tuomas KarhuDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Canthia, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Timo LeppänenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Canthia, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-821X
Sami NikkonenDepartment of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Canthia, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 965417Finnish Anti-Tuberculosis Association Not applicableFinnish Cultural Foundation Not applicableInstrumentarium Science Foundation Not applicableNational Health and Medical Research Council Not applicableNordForsk 90458Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation Not applicableResearch foundation of the Pulmonary Diseases Not applicableRespiratory Foundation of Kuopio Region Not applicableSakari Alhopuro Foundation Not applicableTampereen Tuberkuloosisäätiö Not applicableThe Research Committee of the Kuopio University Hospital Catchment Area for the State Research Funding 5041794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity assessment is based on manually scored respiratory events and their arbitrary definitions. Thus, we present an alternative method to objectively evaluate OSA severity independently of the manual scorings and scoring rules. A retrospective envelope analysis was conducted on 847 suspected OSA patients. Four parameters were calculated from the difference between the nasal pressure signal's upper and lower envelopes: average (AV), median (MD), standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CoV). We computed the parameters from the entirety of the recorded signals to perform binary classifications of patients using three different apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) thresholds (5-15-30). Additionally, the calculations were undertaken in 30-second epochs to estimate the ability of the parameters to detect manually scored respiratory events. Classification performances were assessed with areas under the curves (AUCs). As a result, the SD (AUCs ≥ 0.86) and CoV (AUCs ≥ 0.82) were the best classifiers for all AHI thresholds. Furthermore, non-OSA and severe OSA patients were separated well with SD (AUC = 0.97) and CoV (AUC = 0.95). Respiratory events within the epochs were identified moderately with MD (AUC = 0.76) and CoV (AUC = 0.82). In conclusion, envelope analysis is a promising alternative method by which to assess OSA severity without relying on manual scoring or the scoring rules of respiratory events.

Indexed as

envelope analysisnasal pressureobjective analysisrespiratory eventseverity estimationsleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID37238259
PMCPMC10217613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.