Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238174›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Deep Feature Fusion of Improved Suspected Keratoconus Detection with Deep Learning.

Ali H Al-Timemy, Laith Alzubaidi, Zahraa M Mosa, Hazem Abdelmotaal, Nebras H Ghaeb, Alexandru Lavric, Rossen M Hazarbassanov, Hidenori Takahashi, Yuantong Gu, Siamak Yousefi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Deep learning approach for analyzing regional scheimpflug corneal images to assess keratoconus progression.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Performance of ChatGPT in Diagnosis of Corneal Eye Diseases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali H Al-TimemyBiomedical Engineering Department, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10011, Iraq.
Laith AlzubaidiSchool of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7296-5413
Zahraa M MosaDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad 64021, Iraq.
Hazem AbdelmotaalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Assiut University, Assiut 71526, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-3796
Nebras H GhaebBiomedical Engineering Department, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10011, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-9812-0718
Alexandru LavricComputers, Electronics and Automation Department, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7734-4854
Rossen M HazarbassanovMedical School, Universidade Anhembi Morumbi, São Paulo 03101-001, Brazil.
Hidenori TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 329-0431, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5331-4730
Yuantong GuSchool of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Siamak YousefiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

Funding

ARVO ARVO Roche 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of early clinical keratoconus (KCN) is a challenging task, even for expert clinicians. In this study, we propose a deep learning (DL) model to address this challenge. We first used Xception and InceptionResNetV2 DL architectures to extract features from three different corneal maps collected from 1371 eyes examined in an eye clinic in Egypt. We then fused features using Xception and InceptionResNetV2 to detect subclinical forms of KCN more accurately and robustly. We obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.99 and an accuracy range of 97-100% to distinguish normal eyes from eyes with subclinical and established KCN. We further validated the model based on an independent dataset with 213 eyes examined in Iraq and obtained AUCs of 0.91-0.92 and an accuracy range of 88-92%. The proposed model is a step toward improving the detection of clinical and subclinical forms of KCN.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksdeep learningfeature fusionkeratoconusmachine learningtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37238174
PMCPMC10217517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.