Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238167›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Liver-Specific Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (Ce-MRCP) in Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Biliary Leakage.

Renato Argirò, Bruno Sensi, Leandro Siragusa, Luigi Bellini, Luigi Edoardo Conte, Camilla Riccetti, Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco, Edoardo Troncone, Roberto Floris, Mike Salavracos and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Utility of DynamicBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Renato ArgiròInterventional Radiology Unit, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-4658
Bruno SensiHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Leandro SiragusaHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-1176
Luigi BelliniInterventional Radiology Unit, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1280-3022
Luigi Edoardo ConteHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Camilla RiccettiHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Giovanna Del Vecchio BlancoGastroenterology Unit, Department of System medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6327-563X
Edoardo TronconeGastroenterology Unit, Department of System medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Roberto FlorisDiagnostic Imaging, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Mike SalavracosDepartment of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe TisoneHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro AnselmoHPB and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-8120
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current non-invasive diagnostic modalities of iatrogenic bile leak (BL) are not particularly sensitive and often fail to localise the BL origin. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are considered the gold standard, yet are invasive studies with potential complications. Ce-MRCP has been not comprehensively studied in this setting but may prove particularly helpful given its non-invasive nature and the anatomical dynamic detail. This paper reports a monocentric retrospective study of BL patients referred between January 2018 and November 2022 submitted to Ce-MRCP followed by PTC. The primary outcome was the accuracy of Ce-MRCP in detecting and localising BL compared to PTC and ERCP. Blood tests, coexisting cholangitis features and time for leak resolution were also investigated. Thirty-nine patients were included. Liver-specific contrast-enhanced MRCP detected BL in 69% of cases. The BL localisation was 100% accurate. Total bilirubin above 4 mg/dL was significantly associated with false negative results of Ce-MRCP. Ce-MRCP is highly accurate in detecting and localising BL, but sensitivity is significantly reduced by a high bilirubin level. Ce-MRCP may be very useful in early BL diagnosis and in accurate pre-treatment planning, but can only be reliably used in selected patients with TB < 4 mg/dL. Non-surgical techniques, both radiological and endoscopic, are proven to be effective in terms of leak resolution.

Indexed as

bile leakcontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatographyhepato-biliary surgerypercutaneous transhepatic cholangiography

Identifiers

PMID37238167
PMCPMC10217083
OpenAlexW4376116185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.