Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238149›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Identifying the Key Components in ResNet-50 for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading from Fundus Images: A Systematic Investigation.

Yijin Huang, Li Lin, Pujin Cheng, Junyan Lyu, Roger Tam, Xiaoying Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yijin HuangDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Li LinDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Pujin ChengDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Junyan LyuDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5744-5201
Roger TamSchool of Biomedical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4593-2587
Xiaoying TangDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 62071210Shenzhen Basic Research Program JCYJ20190809120205578Shenzhen Basic Research Program JCYJ20200925153847004Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee KCXFZ2020122117340001Shenzhen Science and Technology Program RCYX20210609103056042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although deep learning-based diabetic retinopathy (DR) classification methods typically benefit from well-designed architectures of convolutional neural networks, the training setting also has a non-negligible impact on prediction performance. The training setting includes various interdependent components, such as an objective function, a data sampling strategy, and a data augmentation approach. To identify the key components in a standard deep learning framework (ResNet-50) for DR grading, we systematically analyze the impact of several major components. Extensive experiments are conducted on a publicly available dataset EyePACS. We demonstrate that (1) the DR grading framework is sensitive to input resolution, objective function, and composition of data augmentation; (2) using mean square error as the loss function can effectively improve the performance with respect to a task-specific evaluation metric, namely the quadratically weighted Kappa; (3) utilizing eye pairs boosts the performance of DR grading and; (4) using data resampling to address the problem of imbalanced data distribution in EyePACS hurts the performance. Based on these observations and an optimal combination of the investigated components, our framework, without any specialized network design, achieves a state-of-the-art result (0.8631 for Kappa) on the EyePACS test set (a total of 42,670 fundus images) with only image-level labels. We also examine the proposed training practices on other fundus datasets and other network architectures to evaluate their generalizability. Our codes and pre-trained model are available online.

Indexed as

classificationdiabetic retinopathytraining setting

Identifiers

PMID37238149
PMCPMC10216935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.