Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37238011›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Utilizing NU

Dalton Obermier, Melanie Trenahile-Grannemann, Ty Schmidt, Tom Rathje, Benny Mote

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Continuous NUTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dalton ObermierDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Melanie Trenahile-GrannemannDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.
Ty SchmidtDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-4056
Tom RathjeDNA Swine Genetics, 2415 13th Street, Columbus, NE 68601, USA.
Benny MoteDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed cost accounts for over two-thirds of the variable cost of production. In order to reduce feed costs without sacrificing production numbers, feed efficiency must be improved. Calorie expenditure has been difficult to quantify in the past but is understood to impact residual feed intake (RFI) greatly. The objective of this work was to utilize an advanced computer vision system to evaluate activity levels across sex and sire groups with different expected breeding value combinations for growth and feed intake. A total of 199 pigs from four different sire groups (DNA Genetics Line 600) High Feed Intake/High Growth (HIHG), Low Feed Intake/High Growth (LIHG), High Feed Intake/Low Growth (HILG), and Low Feed Intake/Low Growth (LILG) were utilized at the UNL ENREC farm over 127 days. The NU

Indexed as

activitycostefficiencyNUtrackpigs

Identifiers

PMID37238011
PMCPMC10215336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.