Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237761›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Synergistic Activity of Cefiderocol in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Fosfomycin, Ampicillin-Sulbactam, Imipenem-Relebactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Marta Palombo, Federica Bovo, Stefano Amadesi, Paolo Gaibani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virulence · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Beyond the Usual Suspects: EmergingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Siderophore cephalosporins.EcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Combating Metallo-β-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. The challenges of difficult-to-treatClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  13. Challenges Facing Two Outbreaks of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibiotic Treatment of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta PalomboMicrobiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Federica BovoDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4633-9881
Stefano AmadesiMicrobiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8942-0818
Paolo GaibaniMicrobiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3791-8635

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata, Giovani Ricercatori) GR-2018-12367572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited treatment options are among the main reasons why antimicrobial resistance has become a leading major public health problem. In particular, carbapenem-resistant

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistance (AMR)carbapenem-resistant bacteriacefiderocolgram-negative bacteriasynergy

Identifiers

PMID37237761
PMCPMC10215675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.