Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237693›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Automatic Multiple Articulator Segmentation in Dynamic Speech MRI Using a Protocol Adaptive Stacked Transfer Learning U-NET Model.

Subin Erattakulangara, Karthika Kelat, David Meyer, Sarv Priya, Sajan Goud Lingala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Estimating Palatal and Pharyngeal Muscle Contraction in Hindi Syllable Pronunciation using Computational Modeling.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Subin ErattakulangaraRoy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Karthika KelatRoy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
David MeyerJanette Ogg Voice Research Center, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA 22601, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9514-0457
Sarv PriyaDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Sajan Goud LingalaRoy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1812-6256

Funding

University of Iowa - Research 3T MRI Connectome UpgradeS10OD025025 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAGNOTTA, VINCENT A · 2018 to 2018
$1.9M
NIH HHS 1S10OD025025-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a powerful modality for investigating upper-airway function during speech production. Analyzing the changes in the vocal tract airspace, including the position of soft-tissue articulators (e.g., the tongue and velum), enhances our understanding of speech production. The advent of various fast speech MRI protocols based on sparse sampling and constrained reconstruction has led to the creation of dynamic speech MRI datasets on the order of 80-100 image frames/second. In this paper, we propose a stacked transfer learning U-NET model to segment the deforming vocal tract in 2D mid-sagittal slices of dynamic speech MRI. Our approach leverages (a) low- and mid-level features and (b) high-level features. The low- and mid-level features are derived from models pre-trained on labeled open-source brain tumor MR and lung CT datasets, and an in-house airway labeled dataset. The high-level features are derived from labeled protocol-specific MR images. The applicability of our approach to segmenting dynamic datasets is demonstrated in data acquired from three fast speech MRI protocols: Protocol 1: 3 T-based radial acquisition scheme coupled with a non-linear temporal regularizer, where speakers were producing French speech tokens; Protocol 2: 1.5 T-based uniform density spiral acquisition scheme coupled with a temporal finite difference (FD) sparsity regularization, where speakers were producing fluent speech tokens in English, and Protocol 3: 3 T-based variable density spiral acquisition scheme coupled with manifold regularization, where speakers were producing various speech tokens from the International Phonetic Alphabetic (IPA). Segments from our approach were compared to those from an expert human user (a vocologist), and the conventional U-NET model without transfer learning. Segmentations from a second expert human user (a radiologist) were used as ground truth. Evaluations were performed using the quantitative DICE similarity metric, the Hausdorff distance metric, and segmentation count metric. This approach was successfully adapted to different speech MRI protocols with only a handful of protocol-specific images (e.g., of the order of 20 images), and provided accurate segmentations similar to those of an expert human.

Indexed as

articulator segmentationdynamic speech MRIprotocol adaptivenesstransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37237693
PMCPMC10215398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.