ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Analysis of the Robotic-Based In Situ Bioprinting Workflow for the Regeneration of Damaged Tissues through a Case Study.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analyzing the Clinical Potential of Stromal Vascular Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Precision surgery in the era of 3D visualization, AR/VR, and 3D printing: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A Pill That Prints-An Ingestible Bioprinter for Non-Invasive Structured Bioink Deposition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Bioprinting Strategies for Cardiovascular Constructs: From Printing Inks to Vascularization.Polymers · 2025Review
- Is Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy the Best Option for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Systematic Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- A robotic arm with open-source reconstructive workflow forApplied physics reviews · 2024Article
- Pioneering Augmented and Mixed Reality in Cranial Surgery: The First Latin American Experience.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcome After Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Cureus · 2024Article
- Integrating Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Redefining Precision with New Technologies.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Biomimetic Scaffolds-A Novel Approach to Three Dimensional Cell Culture Techniques for Potential Implementation in Tissue Engineering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Surgical treatment of orbital tumors in a single center: Analysis and results.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- Latex vascular injection as method for enhanced neurosurgical training and skills.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing microsurgical skills in neurosurgery residents of low-income countries: A comprehensive guide.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to critically analyse the workflow of the in situ bioprinting procedure, presenting a simulated neurosurgical case study, based on a real traumatic event, for collecting quantitative data in support of this innovative approach. After a traumatic event involving the head, bone fragments may have to be removed and a replacement implant placed through a highly demanding surgical procedure in terms of surgeon dexterity. A promising alternative to the current surgical technique is the use of a robotic arm to deposit the biomaterials directly onto the damaged site of the patient following a planned curved surface, which can be designed pre-operatively. Here we achieved an accurate planning-patient registration through pre-operative fiducial markers positioned around the surgical area, reconstructed starting from computed tomography images. Exploiting the availability of multiple degrees of freedom for the regeneration of complex and also overhanging parts typical of anatomical defects, in this work the robotic platform IMAGObot was used to regenerate a cranial defect on a patient-specific phantom. The in situ bioprinting process was then successfully performed showing the great potential of this innovative technology in the field of cranial surgery. In particular, the accuracy of the deposition process was quantified, as well as the duration of the whole procedure was compared to a standard surgical practice. Further investigations include a biological characterisation over time of the printed construct as well as an in vitro and in vivo analysis of the proposed approach, to better analyse the biomaterial performances in terms of osteo-integration with the native tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.