Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237599›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Automatic COVID-19 and Common-Acquired Pneumonia Diagnosis Using Chest CT Scans.

Pedro Crosara Motta, Paulo César Cortez, Bruno R S Silva, Guang Yang, Victor Hugo C de Albuquerque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro Crosara MottaDepartment of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1849-2018
Paulo César CortezDepartment of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4020-3019
Bruno R S SilvaDepartment of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8189-7187
Guang YangNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7344-7733
Victor Hugo C de AlbuquerqueDepartment of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-4309
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even with over 80% of the population being vaccinated against COVID-19, the disease continues to claim victims. Therefore, it is crucial to have a secure Computer-Aided Diagnostic system that can assist in identifying COVID-19 and determining the necessary level of care. This is especially important in the Intensive Care Unit to monitor disease progression or regression in the fight against this epidemic. To accomplish this, we merged public datasets from the literature to train lung and lesion segmentation models with five different distributions. We then trained eight CNN models for COVID-19 and Common-Acquired Pneumonia classification. If the examination was classified as COVID-19, we quantified the lesions and assessed the severity of the full CT scan. To validate the system, we used Resnetxt101 Unet++ and Mobilenet Unet for lung and lesion segmentation, respectively, achieving accuracy of 98.05%, F1-score of 98.70%, precision of 98.7%, recall of 98.7%, and specificity of 96.05%. This was accomplished in just 19.70 s per full CT scan, with external validation on the SPGC dataset. Finally, when classifying these detected lesions, we used Densenet201 and achieved accuracy of 90.47%, F1-score of 93.85%, precision of 88.42%, recall of 100.0%, and specificity of 65.07%. The results demonstrate that our pipeline can correctly detect and segment lesions due to COVID-19 and Common-Acquired Pneumonia in CT scans. It can differentiate these two classes from normal exams, indicating that our system is efficient and effective in identifying the disease and assessing the severity of the condition.

Indexed as

classificationCNNComputer-Aided DiagnosticCOVID-19CT scanexternal validationmedical imagesegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37237599
PMCPMC10215490
OpenAlexW4367322867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.