Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237394›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2023

A YOLO-based AI system for classifying calcifications on spot magnification mammograms.

Jian-Ling Chen, Lan-Hsin Cheng, Jane Wang, Tun-Wei Hsu, Chin-Yu Chen, Ling-Ming Tseng, Shu-Mei Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jian-Ling ChenDepartment of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, No. 21, Sec. 2, Nanya S. Rd., Banciao Dist., New Taipei City, 220, Taiwan.
Lan-Hsin ChengInstitute of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., Tainan City, 701, Taiwan.
Jane WangDepartment of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou Dist., Taipei City, 112, Taiwan.
Tun-Wei HsuDepartment of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou Dist., Taipei City, 112, Taiwan.
Chin-Yu ChenDepartment of Radiology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, No. 901, Zhonghua Rd. Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 710, Taiwan.
Ling-Ming TsengComprehensive Breast Health Center, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shipai Rd., Beitou Dist., Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Shu-Mei GuoInstitute of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., Tainan City, 701, Taiwan. guosm@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 104-2221-E-006-159-MY2Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2221-E-006-193Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan. V111C-225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUse of an AI system based on deep learning to investigate whether the system can aid in distinguishing malignant from benign calcifications on spot magnification mammograms, thus potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we included public and in-house datasets with annotations for the calcifications on both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique vies, or both craniocaudal and mediolateral views of each case of mammograms. All the lesions had pathological results for correlation. Our system comprised an algorithm based on You Only Look Once (YOLO) named adaptive multiscale decision fusion module. The algorithm was pre-trained on a public dataset, Curated Breast Imaging Subset of Digital Database for Screening Mammography (CBIS-DDSM), then re-trained and tested on the in-house dataset of spot magnification mammograms. The performance of the system was investigated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsWe included 1872 images from 753 calcification cases (414 benign and 339 malignant) from CBIS-DDSM. From the in-house dataset, 636 cases (432 benign and 204 malignant) with 1269 spot magnification mammograms were included, with all lesions being recommended for biopsy by radiologists. The area under the ROC curve for our system on the in-house testing dataset was 0.888 (95% CI 0.868-0.908), with a sensitivity of 88.4% (95% CI 86.9-8.99%), specificity of 80.8% (95% CI 77.6-84%), and an accuracy of 84.6% (95% CI 81.8-87.4%) at the optimal cutoff value. Using the system with two views of spot magnification mammograms, 80.8% benign biopsies could be avoided.

conclusionThe AI system showed good accuracy for classification of calcifications on spot magnification mammograms which were all categorized as suspicious by radiologists, thereby potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCalcinosisArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBiopsyBreast cancerCalcificationsMammography

Identifiers

PMID37237394
PMCPMC10224205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.