Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237393›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

A randomised controlled trial of compression therapies for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VenUS 6): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm randomised controlled trial.

C E Arundel, C Welch, P Saramago, U Adderley, R Atkinson, I Chetter, N Cullum, T Davill, J Griffiths, C Hewitt and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C E ArundelYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK. catherine.arundel@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0512-4339
C WelchYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
P SaramagoCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
U AdderleyManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
R AtkinsonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
I ChetterUniversity of Hull, Hull York Medical School and Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
N CullumDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
T DavillYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
J GriffithsDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
C HewittYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
C HirstYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
M KletterDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
J MullingsManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
G RobertsYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
B SmartDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
M SoaresCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
P StatherNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
L StrachanYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
N StubbsNCS Woundcare Consulting Limited, Cornmill Lane, Leeds, LS17 9EQ, UK.
D J TorgersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
J WatsonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
S ZahraYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Lower Ground Floor ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
J DumvilleDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Jean McFarlane Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
University of York · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme NIHR128625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous leg ulcer(s) are common, recurring, open wounds on the lower leg, resulting from diseased or damaged leg veins impairing blood flow. Wound healing is the primary treatment aim for venous leg ulceration, alongside the management of pain, wound exudate and infection. Full (high) compression therapy delivering 40 mmHg of pressure at the ankle is the recommended first-line treatment for venous leg ulcers. There are several different forms of compression therapy available including wraps, two-layer hosiery, and two-layer or four-layer bandages. There is good evidence for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of four-layer bandage and two-layer hosiery but more limited evidence for other treatments (two-layer bandage and compression wraps). Robust evidence is required to compare clinical and cost-effectiveness of these and to investigate which is the best compression treatment for reducing time to healing of venous leg ulcers whilst offering value for money. VenUS 6 will therefore investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of evidence-based compression, two-layer bandage and compression wraps for time to healing of venous leg ulcers.

methodsVenUS 6 is a pragmatic, multi-centre, three-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Adult patients with a venous leg ulcer will be randomised to receive (1) compression wraps, (2) two-layer bandage or (3) evidence-based compression (two-layer hosiery or four-layer bandage). Participants will be followed up for between 4 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be time to healing (full epithelial cover in the absence of a scab) in days since randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include key clinical events (e.g. healing of the reference leg, ulcer recurrence, ulcer/skin deterioration, amputation, admission/discharge, surgery to close/remove incompetent superficial veins, infection or death), treatment changes, adherence and ease of use, ulcer related pain, health-related quality of life and resource use. DISCUSSION: VenUS 6 will provide robust evidence on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the different forms of compression therapies for venous leg ulceration. VenUS 6 opened to recruitment in January 2021 and is currently recruiting across 30 participating centres.

trial registrationISRCTN67321719 . Prospectively registered on 14 September 2020.

Indexed as

Varicose UlcerAdultCompression BandagesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPainPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUlcerCompression therapiesRandomised controlled trialTime to healingVenous leg ulcerWound healing

Identifiers

PMID37237393
PMCPMC10223923
OpenAlexW4378473095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.