Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237343›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

COVID-19 epidemic modelling for policy decision support in Victoria, Australia 2020-2021.

Nick Scott, Romesh G Abeysuriya, Dominic Delport, Rachel Sacks-Davis, Jonathan Nolan, Daniel West, Brett Sutton, Euan M Wallace, Margaret Hellard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nick Scott *Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Nick.Scott@burnet.edu.au.
Romesh G Abeysuriya *Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dominic DelportDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rachel Sacks-DavisDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan NolanVictorian Government Department of Health, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel WestVictorian Government Department of Health, Victoria, Australia.
Brett SuttonVictorian Government Department of Health, Victoria, Australia.
Euan M WallaceVictorian Government Department of Health, Victoria, Australia.
Margaret HellardDisease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Government of Victoria · AUBurnet Institute · AUMonash University · AUPeter Doherty Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolicy responses to COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia over 2020-2021 have been supported by evidence generated through mathematical modelling. This study describes the design, key findings, and process for policy translation of a series of modelling studies conducted for the Victorian Department of Health COVID-19 response team during this period.

methodsAn agent-based model, Covasim, was used to simulate the impact of policy interventions on COVID-19 outbreaks and epidemic waves. The model was continually adapted to enable scenario analysis of settings or policies being considered at the time (e.g. elimination of community transmission versus disease control). Model scenarios were co-designed with government, to fill evidence gaps prior to key decisions.

resultsUnderstanding outbreak risk following incursions was critical to eliminating community COVID-19 transmission. Analyses showed risk depended on whether the first detected case was the index case, a primary contact of the index case, or a 'mystery case'. There were benefits of early lockdown on first case detection and gradual easing of restrictions to minimise resurgence risk from undetected cases. As vaccination coverage increased and the focus shifted to controlling rather than eliminating community transmission, understanding health system demand was critical. Analyses showed that vaccines alone could not protect health systems and need to be complemented with other public health measures.

conclusionsModel evidence offered the greatest value when decisions needed to be made pre-emptively, or for questions that could not be answered with empiric data and data analysis alone. Co-designing scenarios with policy-makers ensured relevance and increased policy translation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPolicySARS-CoV-2VictoriaCOVID-19Disease controlMathematical modelOutbreak analysis

Identifiers

PMID37237343
PMCPMC10219801
OpenAlexW4378515490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.