Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237316›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

The feasibility of negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in paediatric hand and foot burns protocol: a pilot, single-centre, randomised control trial.

Emma Lumsden, Roy Kimble, Catherine McMillan, Kristen Storey, Robert S Ware, Bronwyn Griffin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma LumsdenFaculty of Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia. emma.lumsden@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-9701
Roy KimbleFaculty of Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Catherine McMillanQueensland Children's Hospital, Stanley St., South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Kristen StoreyQueensland Children's Hospital, Stanley St., South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Robert S WareMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Bronwyn GriffinFaculty of Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Griffith University · AUChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AU

Funding

Avant Foundation 2022/000781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe goal of paediatric hand and foot burn management is hypertrophic scar and/or contracture prevention. The risk of scar formation may be minimised by integrating negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as an acute care adjunct as it decreases the time to re-epithelialisation. NPWT has known associated therapeutic burden; however, this burden is hypothesised to be outweighed by an increased likelihood of hypertrophic scar prevention. This study will assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of NPWT in paediatric hand and foot burns with secondary outcomes of time to re-epithelialisation, pain, itch, cost and scar formation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-site, pilot randomised control trial. Participants must be aged ≤ 16 years, otherwise well and managed within 24 h of sustaining either a hand or foot burn. Thirty participants will be randomised to either standard care (Mepitel®-a silicone wound interface contact dressing-and ACTICOAT™-a nanocrystalline silver-impregnated dressing) or standard care plus NPWT. Patients will be reviewed until 3 months post-burn wound re-epithelialisation, with measurements taken at dressing changes to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Surveys, randomisation and data storage will be done via online platforms and physical data storage collated at the Centre for Children's Health Research, Brisbane, Australia. Analysis will be performed using the Stata statistical software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Queensland Health and Griffith University Human Research ethics approval including a site-specific assessment was obtained. The findings of this study will be disseminated through clinical meetings, conference presentations and peer reviewed journals.

trial registrationRegistered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000044729, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381890&isReview=true , registered 17/01/2022).

Indexed as

BurnFeasibility and acceptabilityFootHandNegative pressure wound therapyPaediatric

Identifiers

PMID37237316
PMCPMC10214590
OpenAlexW4378378646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.