Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237301›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2023

Oral emergency contraception practices of community pharmacies: a mystery caller study in the capital of Germany, Berlin.

Gwenda Lungfiel, Franca Mandlmeier, Christian Kunow, Bernhard Langer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gwenda LungfielDepartment of Health, Nursing, Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-8465
Franca MandlmeierDepartment of Health, Nursing, Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-528X
Christian KunowDepartment of Health, Nursing, Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-0344
Bernhard LangerDepartment of Health, Nursing, Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany. langer@hs-nb.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-5229
Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 414051096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, oral emergency contraception (EC) with the active ingredients levonorgestrel (LNG) and ulipristal acetate (UPA) is available as over-the-counter (OTC) medicine only from community pharmacies (CPs). Because of the window of effect, which is limited to only a few days, CPs have a great responsibility to provide rapid and unimpeded access, while also ensuring "adequate" counseling. The aim was-for the first time in Europe and thus also in Germany for the methodology used in this study-to investigate immediate availability, pricing, and aspects of counseling.

methodsCovert mystery calls were conducted in a random sample of CPs stratified by districts in the German capital Berlin. Each of the 263 CPs included was called once at random by one of two trained female student mystery callers. They simulated a product-based scenario for the UPA original ellaOne

resultsOf 257 successfully called CPs, UPA preparations were immediately available in 98.4% (253/257) and LNG preparations in 86.8% (184/212) of CPs. Prices for UPA preparations varied from €15.95 to €42.95 (∆ 169%; median €35.00 [interquartile range (IQR) €5.91]) and for LNG preparations from €10.60 to €32.49 (Δ 207%; median €22.00 [IQR €5.76]). Information about the correct different window of effect of UPA and LNG preparations was provided in 69.8% (127/182) of CPs. UPA preparations were recommended in 63.1% (111/176) and LNG preparations in 17.2% (30/174) of CPs. Information was provided on how to take them as soon as possible in 30.8% (44/143) of CPs and on how to use them after vomiting in 46.0% (64/139).

conclusionsBerlin CPs support access through high immediate availability, especially to UPA preparations. However, access is hampered by high absolute price ranges of both UPA and LNG preparations, which could ideally be minimized by a comparison app. It is positive that CPs promote the benefits of UPA preparations by recommending them noticeably more often than LNG preparations. However, there are deficiencies in giving advice, so there is a need to raise awareness among pharmacy staff to ensure "adequate" counseling in advance over the phone.

Indexed as

AvailabilityCommunity pharmaciesCounselingEmergency contraceptionGermanyMystery callsNon-prescription medicinesPricing

Identifiers

PMID37237301
PMCPMC10215052
OpenAlexW4378470825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.