Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237276›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2023

Perioperative outcomes in different anesthesia techniques for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bo Ma, Haibiao Xie, Huayong Ling, Wuhua Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nationwide analysis of spinal surgery in Japan from 1994 to 2021.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Regional anaesthesia in the emergency centre: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of doctors in the Western Cape, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo Ma *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, People's Republic of China.
Haibiao Xie *Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Huayong LingDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, People's Republic of China.
Wuhua MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510405, People's Republic of China. tuesdaymorninggz@126.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies of the perioperative effects of general and regional anesthesia in adult patients undergoing effects of different anesthesia techniques on patients undergoing hip fracture surgery have not produced consistent results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the hip fracture surgery.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of general anesthesia with regional anesthesia on in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, postoperative pneumonia, and delirium in adult hip fracture patients (≥ 18 years). Between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023, a systematic search was performed for retrospective observational and prospective randomized controlled studies in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

resultsTwenty-one studies including 363,470 patients showed higher in-hospital mortality in the general anesthesia group compared with regional anesthesia (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.13-1.29; P < 0.001, n = 191,511). The 30-day mortality (OR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.96-1.05; P = 0.95, n = 163,811), the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.06; P = 0.28, n = 36,743) and the occurrence of postoperative delirium in the two groups (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.74-1.20; P = 0.61, n = 2861) had no significant difference.

conclusionRegional anesthesia is associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. However, the type of anesthesia did not affect the occurrence of 30-day mortality, postoperative pneumonia, and delirium. A large number of randomized studies are needed in the future to examine the relationship between type of anesthesia, postoperative complications, and mortality.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionEmergence DeliriumHip FracturesAnesthesia, GeneralHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDeliriumGeneral anesthesiaHip fracturesMortalityPneumoniaRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37237276
PMCPMC10224302
OpenAlexW4378516829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.