Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237255›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

Feasibility and efficacy of implementing group visits for women's health conditions: a systematic review.

Sophia Gerontakos, Matthew Leach, Amie Steel, Jon Wardle

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia GerontakosNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, A Block, Military Road, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia. s.gerontakos@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-414X
Matthew LeachNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, A Block, Military Road, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-1913
Amie SteelFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Broadway, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6643-9444
Jon WardleNational Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, A Block, Military Road, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8813-3542
Southern Cross University · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared medical appointments, also known as group visits, are a feasible and well-accepted approach for women receiving antenatal care, yet the feasibility and efficacy of this approach for female-specific reproductive conditions is uncertain.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to (a) determine the feasibility of group visits in adults with any female-specific reproductive condition, and (b) identify whether delivering group care for these conditions impacts clinical outcomes.

methodSix databases and two clinical trials registries were searched from inception through to 26 January 2022 for original research examining group medical visits or group consultation interventions for adults with female reproductive conditions or pathologic conditions specific to the female reproductive system.

resultsThe search yielded 2584 studies, of which four met the inclusion criteria. Included studies sampled women with breast cancer, chronic pelvic pain, polycystic ovary syndrome and gynaecological cancers. Studies reported high levels of patient satisfaction, with participants indicating their expectations had been met or exceeded. The impact of group visits on clinical outcomes was inconclusive however. DISCUSSION/

conclusionsThe studies in this review indicate delivery of female-specific healthcare via a group model maybe feasible and well-accepted. The review provides a solid basis for proposing larger and longer studies on group visits for female reproductive conditions.

trial registrationThe review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020196995).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPrenatal CareAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionPregnancyWomen's HealthBreast cancerChronic pelvic painFemale reproductive healthGroup medical visitsGroup visitsGynaecological cancerPolycystic ovary syndromeShared medical appointmentsSystematic reviewWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37237255
PMCPMC10214697
OpenAlexW4378377085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.