ReviewHuman cell2023
From in vivo to in vitro: exploring the key molecular and cellular aspects of human female gametogenesis.
Review in Human cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling mammalian meiosis with pluripotent stem cells: progress and challenges.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- MiR-31 enhances porcine oocyte maturation via MAPK8/JNK-mediated cumulus expansion and cytoplasmic maturation.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Reporter Alleles in hiPSCs: Visual Cues on Development and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Impact of Adenomyosis on Pregnancy.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The regulatory roles of Smad2/3 protein andInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- Primary ovarian insufficiency: update on clinical and genetic findings.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Application of amphiregulin in IVM culture of immature human oocytes and pre-insemination culture for COCs in IVF cycles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Human oogenesis is a highly complex and not yet fully understood process due to ethical and technological barriers that limit studies in the field. In this context, replicating female gametogenesis in vitro would not only provide a solution for some infertility problems, but also be an excellent study model to better understand the biological mechanisms that determine the formation of the female germline. In this review, we explore the main cellular and molecular aspects involved in human oogenesis and folliculogenesis in vivo, from the specification of primordial germ cells (PGCs) to the formation of the mature oocyte. We also sought to describe the important bidirectional relationship between the germ cell and the follicular somatic cells. Finally, we address the main advances and different methodologies used in the search for obtaining cells of the female germline in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.