Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237155›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Magnetic resonance elastography-derived stiffness: potential imaging biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic masses.

Dingxia Liu, Jiejun Chen, Yunfei Zhang, Yongming Dai, Xiuzhong Yao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dingxia LiuShanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiejun ChenShanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yunfei ZhangShanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongming DaiMR Collaboration, Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Xiuzhong YaoShanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zsyyyxz@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-0985
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study sought to determine the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for pancreatic solid masses, compared with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and serum CA19-9, to establish a threshold for differentiating between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and benign tumors in pancreas. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween July 2021 to January 2023, 75 adult patients confirmed with pancreatic solid tumors were enrolled in this prospective and consecutive study. All patients underwent MRE and DWI examinations that were both performed with a spin echo-EPI sequence. Stiffness maps and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated, with MRE-derived mass stiffness and stiffness ratio (computing as the ratio of mass stiffness to the parenchyma stiffness) and DWI-derived ADC values obtained by placing regions of interest over the focal tumors on stiffness and ADC maps. Further analysis of comparing diagnostic performances was assessed by calculating the area under ROC curves.

resultsPDAC had significantly higher tumor stiffness [3.795 (2.879-4.438) kPa vs. 2.359 (2.01-3.507) kPa, P = 0.0003], stiffness ratio [1.939 (1.562-2.511) vs. 1.187 (1.031-1.453), P < 0.0001] and serum CA19-9 level [276 (31.73-1055) vs. 10.45 (7.825-14.15), P < 0.0001] than other pancreatic masses. Mass stiffness, stiffness ratio and serum CA19-9 showed good diagnostic performance for differentiation with AUC of 0.7895, 0.8392 and 0.9136 respectively. The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value for differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic tumors with mass stiffness (cutoff, > 2.8211 kPa) and stiffness ratio (cutoff, > 1.5117) were 78.4/66.7/82.9/60% and 77.8/83.3/90.3/65.2% respectively. The combined performance of Mass stiffness, stiffness ratio and serum CA19-9 got an AUC of 0.9758.

conclusionMRE holds excellent clinical potential in discriminating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from other pancreatic solid masses according to their mechanical properties.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalElasticity Imaging TechniquesPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultCA-19-9 AntigenDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesCA-19-9 AntigenDWIMREPancreasPDACStiffness

Identifiers

PMID37237155
OpenAlexW4378417219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.