Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Constructing a disease database and using natural language processing to capture and standardize free text clinical information.

Shaina Raza, Brian Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reliability Analysis of Psychological Concept Extraction and Classification in User-penned Text.Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaina RazaPublic Health Ontario (PHO), Toronto, ON, Canada. shaina.raza@utoronto.ca.
Brian SchwartzPublic Health Ontario (PHO), Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to extract critical information about an infectious disease in a timely manner is critical for population health research. The lack of procedures for mining large amounts of health data is a major impediment. The goal of this research is to use natural language processing (NLP) to extract key information (clinical factors, social determinants of health) from free text. The proposed framework describes database construction, NLP modules for locating clinical and non-clinical (social determinants) information, and a detailed evaluation protocol for evaluating results and demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The use of COVID-19 case reports is demonstrated for data construction and pandemic surveillance. The proposed approach outperforms benchmark methods in F1-score by about 1-3%. A thorough examination reveals the disease's presence as well as the frequency of symptoms in patients. The findings suggest that prior knowledge gained through transfer learning can be useful when researching infectious diseases with similar presentations in order to accurately predict patient outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Natural Language ProcessingElectronic Health RecordsHumansPandemicsRecords

Identifiers

PMID37237101
PMCPMC10215040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.