Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Development of a machine learning-based clinical decision support system to predict clinical deterioration in patients visiting the emergency department.

Arom Choi, So Yeon Choi, Kyungsoo Chung, Hyun Soo Chung, Taeyoung Song, Byunghun Choi, Ji Hoon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arom ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
So Yeon ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Kyungsoo ChungDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Soo ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Taeyoung SongLG Electronics, 128 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07336, Republic of Korea.
Byunghun ChoiLG Electronics, 128 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07336, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hoon KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. jichoon81@yuhs.ac.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based clinical decision support system for emergency departments based on the decision-making framework of physicians. We extracted 27 fixed and 93 observation features using data on vital signs, mental status, laboratory results, and electrocardiograms during emergency department stay. Outcomes included intubation, admission to the intensive care unit, inotrope or vasopressor administration, and in-hospital cardiac arrest. eXtreme gradient boosting algorithm was used to learn and predict each outcome. Specificity, sensitivity, precision, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and area under the precision-recall curve were assessed. We analyzed 303,345 patients with 4,787,121 input data, resampled into 24,148,958 1 h-units. The models displayed a discriminative ability to predict outcomes (AUROC > 0.9), and the model with lagging 6 and leading 0 displayed the highest value. The AUROC curve of in-hospital cardiac arrest had the smallest change, with increased lagging for all outcomes. With inotropic use, intubation, and intensive care unit admission, the range of AUROC curve change with the leading 6 was the highest according to different amounts of previous information (lagging). In this study, a human-centered approach to emulate the clinical decision-making process of emergency physicians has been adopted to enhance the use of the system. Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems customized according to clinical situations can help improve the quality of care.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHeart ArrestEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMachine LearningRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37237057
PMCPMC10220080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.