Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237042›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Validation of the BOADICEA model for predicting the likelihood of carrying pathogenic variants in eight breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.

Nanna Bæk Møller, Desirée Sofie Boonen, Elisabeth Simone Feldner, Qin Hao, Martin Larsen, Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm, Åke Borg, Anders Kvist, Therese Törngren, Uffe Birk Jensen and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nanna Bæk MøllerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Brendstrupgårdsvej 21, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Desirée Sofie BoonenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Elisabeth Simone FeldnerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Qin HaoDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Martin LarsenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Anne-Vibeke LænkholmDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Åke BorgDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anders KvistDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Therese TörngrenDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Uffe Birk JensenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Brendstrupgårdsvej 21, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Susanne Eriksen BoonenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Mads ThomassenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark. mads.thomassen@rsyd.dk.
Thorkild TerkelsenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Brendstrupgårdsvej 21, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. thorkild.terkelsen@clin.au.dk.
Odense University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKLund University · SEZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BOADICEA is a comprehensive risk prediction model for breast and/or ovarian cancer (BC/OC) and for carrying pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer susceptibility genes. In addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2, BOADICEA version 6 includes PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, BARD1, RAD51C and RAD51D. To validate its predictions for these genes, we conducted a retrospective study including 2033 individuals counselled at clinical genetics departments in Denmark. All counselees underwent comprehensive genetic testing by next generation sequencing on suspicion of hereditary susceptibility to BC/OC. Likelihoods of PVs were predicted from information about diagnosis, family history and tumour pathology. Calibration was examined using the observed-to-expected ratio (O/E) and discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). The O/E was 1.11 (95% CI 0.97-1.26) for all genes combined. At sub-categories of predicted likelihood, the model performed well with limited misestimation at the extremes of predicted likelihood. Discrimination was acceptable with an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI 0.66-0.74), although discrimination was better for BRCA1 and BRCA2 than for the other genes in the model. This suggests that BOADICEA remains a valid decision-making aid for determining which individuals to offer comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary susceptibility to BC/OC despite suboptimal calibration for individual genes in this population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37237042
PMCPMC10220031
OpenAlexW4378515153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.