Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37237014›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

A diverse and multi-modal gait dataset of indoor and outdoor walks acquired using multiple cameras and sensors.

Luke K Topham, Wasiq Khan, Dhiya Al-Jumeily, Atif Waraich, Abir J Hussain

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luke K TophamLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. l.k.topham@2021.ljmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-7944
Wasiq KhanLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. W.Khan@ljmu.ac.uk.
Dhiya Al-JumeilyLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Atif WaraichLiverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Abir J HussainUniversity of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait datasets are often limited by a lack of diversity in terms of the participants, appearance, viewing angle, environments, annotations, and availability. We present a primary gait dataset comprising 1,560 annotated casual walks from 64 participants, in both indoor and outdoor real-world environments. We used two digital cameras and a wearable digital goniometer to capture visual as well as motion signal gait-data respectively. Traditional methods of gait identification are often affected by the viewing angle and appearance of the participant therefore, this dataset mainly considers the diversity in various aspects (e.g., participants' attributes, background variations, and view angles). The dataset is captured from 8 viewing angles in 45° increments along-with alternative appearances for each participant, for example, via a change of clothing. The dataset provides 3,120 videos, containing approximately 748,800 image frames with detailed annotations including approximately 56,160,000 bodily keypoint annotations, identifying 75 keypoints per video frame, and approximately 1,026,480 motion data points captured from a digital goniometer for three limb segments (thigh, upper arm, and head).

Indexed as

GaitWearable Electronic DevicesHumansMotion

Identifiers

PMID37237014
PMCPMC10220063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.