Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37236966›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2023

Using a willingness to wait design to assess how readers value text.

Amrita Bains, Carina Spaulding, Jessie Ricketts, Saloni Krishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Providing choice enhances reading motivation.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  3. Investigating Reading Enjoyment in Adults With Dyslexia.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amrita BainsDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. amrita.bains.2020@live.rhul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-6192
Carina SpauldingThe Reading Agency, 24 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4EH, UK.
Jessie RickettsDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Saloni KrishnanDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK. saloni.krishnan@rhul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-141X

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF006\1031Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What affects moment-to-moment motivation to read? Existing reading motivation questionnaires are trait-based and not well suited to capturing the dynamic, situational influences of text or social context. Drawing on the decision science literature, we have created a paradigm to measure situational enjoyment during reading. Using this paradigm, we find reading enjoyment is associated with further decision-making about the text and with reading comprehension.

Identifiers

PMID37236966
PMCPMC10220033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.