ArticleAcademic radiology2023
AI-Based Isotherm Prediction for Focal Cryoablation of Prostate Cancer.
Article in Academic radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review of current evidence and future directions.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Thermal Ablation: Current Applications and Future Directions in Microwave Technologies.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Image-Guided Adaptive Cryotherapy for Prostate Cancer Treatment.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Role of Computational Modelling in Enhancing Thermal Safety During Cardiac Ablation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: navigating the new frontier of precision uro-oncology.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2025Review
- Cryoablation in the treatment of early breast cancer: a comprehensive analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Predicting rectal cancer prognosis from histopathological images and clinical information using multi-modal deep learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesFocal therapies have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives for patients with localized low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and those with postradiation recurrence. Among the available focal treatment methods for PCa, cryoablation offers several technical advantages, including the visibility of the boundaries of frozen tissue on the intraprocedural images, access to anterior lesions, and the proven ability to treat postradiation recurrence. However, predicting the final volume of the frozen tissue is challenging as it depends on several patient-specific factors, such as proximity to heat sources and thermal properties of the prostatic tissue. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis paper presents a convolutional neural network model based on 3D-Unet to predict the frozen isotherm boundaries (iceball) resultant from a given a cryo-needle placement. Intraprocedural magnetic resonance images acquired during 38 cases of focal cryoablation of PCa were retrospectively used to train and validate the model. The model accuracy was assessed and compared against a vendor-provided geometrical model, which is used as a guideline in routine procedures.
resultsThe mean Dice Similarity Coefficient using the proposed model was 0.79±0.08 (mean+SD) vs 0.72±0.06 using the geometrical model (P<.001).
conclusionThe model provided an accurate iceball boundary prediction in less than 0.4second and has proven its feasibility to be implemented in an intraprocedural planning algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.