ArticleHealthcare management forum2023
Physician ratings of physician assistant competencies and their experiences and satisfaction working with physician assistants: Results from the supervising physician survey in Ontario, Canada.
Article in Healthcare management forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of Medical Associate Professions (MAPs) on the productivity, quality of care, patient and healthcare workforce satisfaction, and budget implications in various healthcare settings: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Developing and integrating physician assistants/associates in UK hospital teams: a realist review of lessons from international experiences.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- Retiring trends The role of artificial intelligence in mitigating the urologist shortage in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physician Assistants (PAs) are a relatively new addition to the Ontario healthcare system. To understand the impact of the PA role, this study investigated supervising physician satisfaction and perception of PA roles, interprofessional team integration, pandemic supports, and barriers and enablers to PA employment. A web-based survey was conducted of 118 physician supervisors of Ontario PA education program alumni. PAs were employed in a variety of community and hospital settings. In addition to patient care, PAs were involved teaching (65.6%), quality improvement (52.7%), and mentorship (40.0%). Overall, 92.9% of physicians indicated they were satisfied with their PAs. Important barriers to hiring PAs included maintaining PA salaries, billing limitations, and PA shortages. PAs have established themselves as valuable and competent members of healthcare teams. By continuing to explore the enablers and barriers to PA employment from the physician perspective, health leaders can continue to optimize and support role integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.