ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023
[Readiness for Implementation of Prevention and Health Promotion Measures for People in Difficult Living Situations in Deprived Municipalities in Bavaria: A Qualitative Analysis].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe community setting is crucial to improving health equity. To enable the implementation of need-based and target-oriented measures, it is important to understand the challenges and needs of communities. This is highly relevant for deprived communities that have offered hardly any health promotion programs for socially disadvantaged people. The main research question of this study is: "How do deprived communities perceive the need for action and support in connection with the implementation of disease prevention and health promotion measures focused on socially disadvantaged people?"
methodsA qualitative, exploratory analysis through semi-structured interviews with experts (n=10) was conducted in five deprived communities in Bavaria. The degree of deprivation was represented by the Bavarian Index of Multiple Deprivation (BIMD, 2010), which shows the extent of lack of resources at the community level. Qualitative analysis of the interviews followed the theoretical framework of qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.
resultsThemes arising from the interviews were (1) groups perceived to be in need of support, (2) disease prevention and health promotion assets, and (3) need for action regarding prevention and health promotion. Target groups in need of support were identified in the analyzed communities. Furthermore, it became apparent that in deprived communities there were scarcely resources and structures to address disease prevention and health promotion.
conclusionThis study shows that deprived communities need support to implement need-based and target-oriented prevention and health promotion measures for socially disadvantaged people. However, those communities have limited capacities, and thus should be supported (e. g., through networking).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.