Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2023
Tafenoquine co-administered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria (INSPECTOR): a randomised, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02802501 (Study 200894), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study 200894: A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled Superiority Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tafenoquine (SB-252263, WR238605) Co-administered With Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PQP) for the Radical Cure of Plasmodium Vivax Malaria
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated reporting of primaquine dose efficacy, tolerability and safety for Plasmodium vivax malaria using a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.Malaria journal · 2025Pooled it
- Methaemoglobin as a surrogate marker of primaquine antihypnozoite activity in Plasmodium vivax malaria: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of 7-day high-dose primaquine and single-dose tafenoquine versus 14-day low-dose primaquine in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria (EFFORT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Effect of higher dose primaquine for the radical cure ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Beyond elimination; addressing challenges in maintaining the malaria elimination status in Suriname.Malaria journal · 2026Review
- Dissemination of EFFORT trial results in Indonesia: a stakeholder meeting report on tafenoquine and primaquine for radical cure of Plasmodium vivax.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- G6PD deficiency in Indonesia: a systematic review and update of prevalence and variant maps in the context of malaria elimination.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Moving towards high-dose primaquine or single-dose tafenoquine for Plasmodium vivax treatment in Cambodia: a meeting report from dissemination of results of the EFFORT trial to stakeholders.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of tafenoquine and primaquine for radical cure of Plasmodium vivax: a meeting report from dissemination of results of the EFFORT trial to stakeholders in Pakistan.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Reimagining Social Value to Consider the Environment: How Should We Judge the Magnitude of Benefits in Health Research?Bioethics · 2025Article
- Article
- Perceptions of shorter radical cure Plasmodium vivax treatment regimens and their implementation: a qualitative study among stakeholders in Cambodia.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Radical Cure of Plasmodium vivax With Primaquine and CYP2D6 Polymorphism in Southeast Asia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
- Fractional curative killing of pyronaridine or artesunate combinations with tafenoquine, 4-aminoquinolines, or azithromycin in a murine malaria-luciferase model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Cethromycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for single dose cure ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Focal Primaquine Mass Administration for EliminatingOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Emerging Molecular Mechanisms in Malaria Pathogenesis and Novel Therapeutic Approaches: A Focus onBiomolecules · 2025Review
- Quantifying Plasmodium vivax radical cure efficacy: a modelling study integrating clinical trial data and transmission dynamics.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Prospective observational study to assess the feasibility and safety of appropriateBMJ global health · 2025Observational
- Malaria.The New England journal of medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
29 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTafenoquine, co-administered with chloroquine, is approved for the radical cure (prevention of relapse) of Plasmodium vivax malaria. In areas of chloroquine resistance, artemisinin-based combination therapies are used to treat malaria. This study aimed to evaluate tafenoquine plus the artemisinin-based combination therapy dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the radical cure of P vivax malaria.
methodsIn this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-normal Indonesian soldiers with microscopically confirmed P vivax malaria were randomly assigned by means of a computer-generated randomisation schedule (1:1:1) to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus a masked single 300-mg dose of tafenoquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus 14 days of primaquine (15 mg). The primary endpoint was 6-month relapse-free efficacy following tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of masked treatment and had microscopically confirmed P vivax at baseline (microbiological intention-to-treat population). Safety was a secondary outcome and the safety population comprised all patients who received at least one dose of masked medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02802501 and is completed.
findingsBetween April 8, 2018, and Feb 4, 2019, of 164 patients screened for eligibility, 150 were randomly assigned (50 per treatment group). 6-month Kaplan-Meier relapse-free efficacy (microbiological intention to treat) was 11% (95% CI 4-22) in patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone versus 21% (11-34) in patients treated with tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (hazard ratio 0·44; 95% CI [0·29-0·69]) and 52% (37-65) in the primaquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group. Adverse events over the first 28 days were reported in 27 (54%) of 50 patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone, 29 (58%) of 50 patients treated with tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, and 22 (44%) of 50 patients treated with primaquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Serious adverse events were reported in one (2%) of 50, two (4%) of 50, and two (4%) of 50 of patients, respectively.
interpretationAlthough tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was statistically superior to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone for the radical cure of P vivax malaria, the benefit was not clinically meaningful. This contrasts with previous studies in which tafenoquine plus chloroquine was clinically superior to chloroquine alone for radical cure of P vivax malaria.
fundingExxonMobil, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Newcrest Mining, UK Government all through Medicines for Malaria Venture; and GSK. TRANSLATION: For the Indonesian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.