ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023
In Situ Exfoliation Method of Large-Area 2D Materials.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Halogen-Mediated Polymer-Free Recovery of Pristine MoSSmall methods · 2026Article
- Unravelling friction anisotropy by atomic force microscopy.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Spontaneous Room-Temperature Solid-State Reaction at the MoSACS applied nano materials · 2025Article
- Unveiling Boundary-Localized Interfacial Interactions in Temperature-Controlled Au-Assisted Exfoliation of MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hybridization Directionality Governs the Interaction Strength between MoSNano letters · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Xenes Based FET for Biosensing Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Strain-Induced Decoupling Drives Gold-Assisted Exfoliation of Large-Area Monolayer 2D Crystals.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Controlling Gold-Assisted Exfoliation of Large-Area MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In Situ Exfoliation Method of Large-Area 2D Materials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
2D materials provide a rich platform to study novel physical phenomena arising from quantum confinement of charge carriers. Many of these phenomena are discovered by surface sensitive techniques, such as photoemission spectroscopy, that work in ultra-high vacuum (UHV). Success in experimental studies of 2D materials, however, inherently relies on producing adsorbate-free, large-area, high-quality samples. The method that yields 2D materials of highest quality is mechanical exfoliation from bulk-grown samples. However, as this technique is traditionally performed in a dedicated environment, the transfer of samples into vacuum requires surface cleaning that might diminish the quality of the samples. In this article, a simple method for in situ exfoliation directly in UHV is reported, which yields large-area, single-layered films. Multiple metallic and semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides are exfoliated in situ onto Au, Ag, and Ge. The exfoliated flakes are found to be of sub-millimeter size with excellent crystallinity and purity, as supported by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and low-energy electron diffraction. The approach is well-suited for air-sensitive 2D materials, enabling the study of a new suite of electronic properties. In addition, the exfoliation of surface alloys and the possibility of controlling the substrate-2D material twist angle is demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.