ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism2023
Evaluating the strength of evidence for genes implicated in peroxisomal disorders using the ClinGen clinical validity framework and providing updates to the peroxisomal disease nomenclature.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Generating Clinical-Grade Gene-Disease Validity Classifications Through the ClinGen Data Platforms.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Peroxisomal disorders are heterogeneous in nature, with phenotypic overlap that is indistinguishable without molecular testing. Newborn screening and gene sequencing for a panel of genes implicated in peroxisomal diseases are critical tools for the early and accurate detection of these disorders. It is therefore essential to evaluate the clinical validity of the genes included in sequencing panels for peroxisomal disorders. The Peroxisomal Gene Curation Expert Panel (GCEP) assessed genes frequently included on clinical peroxisomal testing panels using the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) gene-disease validity curation framework and classified gene-disease relationships as Definitive, Strong, Moderate, Limited, Disputed, Refuted, or No Known Disease Relationship. Subsequent to gene curation, the GCEP made recommendations to update the disease nomenclature and ontology in the Monarch Disease Ontology (Mondo) database. Thirty-six genes were assessed for the strength of evidence supporting their role in peroxisomal disease, leading to 36 gene-disease relationships, after two genes were removed for their lack of a role in peroxisomal disease and two genes were curated for two different disease entities each. Of these, 23 were classified as Definitive (64%), one as Strong (3%), eight as Moderate (23%), two as Limited (5%), and two as No known disease relationship (5%). No contradictory evidence was found to classify any relationships as Disputed or Refuted. The gene-disease relationship curations are publicly available on the ClinGen website (https://clinicalgenome.org/affiliation/40049/). The changes to peroxisomal disease nomenclature are displayed on the Mondo website (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0019053). The Peroxisomal GCEP-curated gene-disease relationships will inform clinical and laboratory diagnostics and enhance molecular testing and reporting. As new data will emerge, the gene-disease classifications asserted by the Peroxisomal GCEP will be re-evaluated periodically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.