Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37235450›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2023

Are They Thinking Differently? The Perceptions and Differences in Medical Disputes between Veterinarians and Clients.

Zih-Fang Chen, Yi-Hsin Elsa Hsu, Jih-Jong Lee, Chung-Hsi Chou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zih-Fang ChenZoonoses Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsin Elsa HsuExecutive Master Program of Business Administration in Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8962-6111
Jih-Jong LeeInstitute of Veterinary Clinical Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Chung-Hsi ChouZoonoses Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-2786
National Taiwan University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical disputes in veterinary practices are widespread; yet, a limited amount of research has been conducted to investigate the factors contributing to medical disputes. This study examined veterinarians' and clients' perceptions regarding risk factors and possible solutions to medical disputes. A total of 245 respondents from Taiwan, including 125 veterinarians and 120 clients, completed an electronic self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire in 2022. The questionnaire covered six dimensions: medical skills, complaint management, the attitudes of stakeholders during interactions, medical expenses, clients' perspectives, and communication modes. The results highlighted significant differences in the perceptions of risk factors for inducing medical disputes and possible solutions between clients and veterinarians in veterinary practice. First, young veterinarians and clients perceived medical skills as the highest risk factor for inducing medical disputes, while experienced veterinarians disagreed (

Indexed as

attitudes of stakeholdersclientscommunicationcomplaint managementmedical disputemedical expensemedical skillspet ownerquestionnairerisk factor for medical disputesveterinariansveterinary education

Identifiers

PMID37235450
PMCPMC10220729
OpenAlexW4378087488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.