Replacement of the Mouse LD

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Cell-Based Potency Assay for Determining the Relative Potency of Botulinum Neurotoxin A Preparations Using Manual and Semi-Automated Procedures.Toxins · 2026
   Article
2. Evaluation of a Cell-Based Potency Assay for Detection of the Potency of TrenibotulinumtoxinEToxins · 2025
   Article
3. Research Progress on the Detection Methods of Botulinum Neurotoxin.Toxins · 2025
   Review
4. An automated platform for simultaneous, longitudinal analysis of engineered neuromuscular tissues for applications in neurotoxin potency testing.Current research in toxicology · 2025
   Article
5. Botulinum neurotoxin: Tracking the transition from lethal dose toNAM journal · 2025
   Article
6. A Validation of the Equivalence of the Cell-Based Potency Assay Method with a Mouse LDToxins · 2024
   Article
7. Botulinum Neurotoxins: From Toxin to Medicine.Toxins · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as