Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37235225›Full record

ReviewToxics2023

A Review of Traditional and Emerging Residual Chlorine Quenchers on Disinfection By-Products: Impact and Mechanisms.

Xue Li, Zhijing Zhao, Zheng Qu, Xinyu Li, Zengli Zhang, Xiaojun Liang, Jingsi Chen, Jiafu Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xue LiSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Zhijing ZhaoSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Zheng QuSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Xinyu LiSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Zengli ZhangSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Xiaojun LiangKunshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Suzhou 215301, China.
Jingsi ChenSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Jiafu LiSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China.
Soochow University · CNChinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M713301the initial Scientific Research Fund of Soochow University, the Student's Extracurricular Scientific Research Fund of Medical College of Soochow University 2021YXBKWKY026the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20210737the Suzhou Found for Prevention and Control Technology of critical illness and infectious diseases GWZX202204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disinfection by-products (DBPs) are the most common organic contaminants in tap water and are of wide concern because of their highly developmental toxic, cytotoxic, and carcinogenic properties. Typically, to control the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms, a certain concentration of residual chlorine is retained in the factory water, which reacts with the natural organic matter and the disinfection by-products that have been formed, thus affecting the determination of DBPs. Therefore, to obtain an accurate concentration, residual chlorine in tap water needs to be quenched prior to treatment. Currently, the most commonly used quenching agents are ascorbic acid, sodium thiosulfate, ammonium chloride, sodium sulfite, and sodium arsenite, but these quenching agents can cause varying degrees of DBPs degradation. Therefore, in recent years, researchers have attempted to find emerging chlorine quenchers. However, no studies have been conducted to systematically review the effects of traditional quenchers and new ones on DBPs, as well as their advantages, disadvantages, and scope of application. For inorganic DBPs (bromate, chlorate, and chlorite), sodium sulfite has been proven to be the ideal chlorine quencher. For organic DBPs, although ascorbic acid caused the degradation of some DBPs, it remains the ideal quenching agent for most known DBPs. Among the studied emerging chlorine quenchers, n-acetylcysteine (NAC), glutathione (GSH), and 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene are promising for their application as the ideal chlorine quencher of organic DBPs. The dehalogenation of trichloronitromethane, trichloroacetonitrile, trichloroacetamide, and bromochlorophenol by sodium sulfite is caused by nucleophilic substitution reaction. This paper takes the understanding of DBPs and traditional and emerging chlorine quenchers as a starting point to comprehensively summarize their effects on different types of DBPs, and to provide assistance in understanding and selecting the most suitable residual chlorine quenchers during DBPs research.

Indexed as

chlorine quenchersdisinfection by-productsdrinking waterresidual chlorine

Identifiers

PMID37235225
PMCPMC10222485
OpenAlexW4367051255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.