ArticleTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation2023
A Secondary Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Variability of Inspiratory Muscle Performance in People Living With SCI.
Article in Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the expected variability in repeated short-term (ST) and long-term (LT) inspiratory muscle performance (IMP) in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), sustained MIP (SMIP), and inspiratory duration (ID) were collected from 22 individuals with chronic SCI (C1-T9, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] A-C) over 18 months. ST data were collected four times within 2 weeks ( Results: SMIP was the most reliable IMP assessment with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.959, followed by MIP (ICC 0.874) and ID (ICC 0.689). The ID was the only ST measure to have a significant difference [MIP: Conclusion: These data provide a foundation for understanding normal variance in ST and LT IMP in the SCI population. Change in MIP function outside 10% is likely a true and meaningful change and may help clinicians recognize individuals with SCI at risk for respiratory compromise. Future studies should explore changes in MIP and SMIP that are associated with meaningful functional changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.