ArticleChemical & biomedical imaging2023
Simulations of Subnanometer Scale Image Contrast in Atomic Force Microscopy of Self-Assembled Monolayers in Water.
Article in Chemical & biomedical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving high-resolution images using dynamic atomic force microscopy (AFM) requires understanding how chemical and structural features of the surface affect image contrast. This understanding is particularly challenging when imaging samples in water. An initial step is to determine how well-characterized surface features interact with the AFM tip in wet environments. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations of a model AFM tip apex oscillating in water above self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) with different chain lengths and functional groups. The amplitude response of the tip is characterized across a range of vertical distances and amplitude set points. Then relative image contrast is quantified as the difference of the amplitude response of the tip when it is positioned directly above a SAM functional group vs positioned between two functional groups. Differences in contrast between SAMs with different lengths and functional groups are explained in terms of the vertical deflection of the SAMs due to interactions with the tip and water during dynamic imaging. The knowledge gained from simulations of these simple model systems may ultimately be used to guide selection of imaging parameters for more complex surfaces.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.