ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
Correction of Breast Ptosis in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced techniques for mastopexy in patients with ptotic breasts requiring nipple-sparing mastectomy: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Staged multimodal correction of implant rippling after prepectoral breast reconstruction with thin mastectomy flaps: a case report.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2026Article
- The Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Sequential Liposuction Modified Double Ring Areola Incision in Moderate and Severe Breast Ptosis Correction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nipple-sparing mastectomy is psychologically advantageous and can result in superior cosmetic outcomes. However, nipple position adjustment is challenging, and ischemic complications may arise. For patients who require timely mastectomies and reconstructions, concurrent mastopexy may prevent nipple malposition and reduce the risk for future corrections. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing immediate prosthetic reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy were analyzed. Data regarding patient characteristics; surgical indications; reconstructive modality, including presence or absence of simultaneous nipple lift; and early and late complications were examined. Results: In total, 142 patients underwent 228 nipple-sparing mastectomies and prosthetic reconstructions. Correction of ptosis (lift) was performed in 22 patients and 34 breasts. The remaining 122 patients and 194 breasts did not receive mastopexy (no-lift). Two patients received bilateral reconstructions involving both lift and no-lift. Comparing the lift and no-lift cohorts demonstrated no differences in major complications (47.1% versus 57.7%; Conclusion: Simultaneous correction of nipple position in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction seem safe with uniform complications rates that are unaffected by acellular dermal matrix use or plane of implant placement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.