ReviewPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023
A Practical Review of the Management of
Review in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comprehensive evaluation of flap reconstruction in periocular repair: outcomes, complications, and future directions.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical effect and safety of medicated thread moxibustion on xanthelasma palpebrarum: A retrospective cohort study.Medicine · 2025Observational
- A Novel Surgical Strategy for Repairing Postoperative Xanthelasma Defects Using Lax Upper Eyelid Skin.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Carbon dioxide laser excision as a novel treatment for large xanthelasma palpebrarum: long-term efficacy and safety.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effective treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum using Er:YAG laser.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Er:YAG Laser Therapy for Xanthelasma Palpebrarum: A Retrospective Case Series Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes in Periocular Lesion Management.Case reports in dermatological medicine · 2025Article
- A comparative study of the efficacy of an ultra-picosecond laser versus an ultra-pulsed COAmerican journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Aesthetic Surgical Treatment of Large Xanthelasma palpebrarum.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Genetic insight into putative causes of xanthelasma palpebrarum: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Digital Patient Education on Xanthelasma Palpebrarum: A Content Analysis.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify clinical studies that reported on outcomes and complications of different methods of Results: Forty-nine articles (including 1329 patients) were reviewed. The studies reported on surgical excision, laser modalities, electrosurgical techniques, chemical peeling, cryotherapy, and intralesional injection. The majority of studies were retrospective (69%) and single-arm (84%). Surgical excision combined with blepharoplasty and skin grafts showed excellent outcomes for large Conclusions: Different methods for the treatment of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.