ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Genomic prediction of optimal cross combinations to accelerate genetic improvement of soybean (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progeny-based genomic selection reveals untapped genetic potential in an underutilized medicinal plant,Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026Article
- Image-based high-throughput phenotyping enables genetic analyses of pod morphological traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Augmenting plant-pollinator interactions to promote biodiversity and global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Mainstreaming3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Optimal implementation of genomic selection in clone breeding programs exemplified in potato: II. Effect of selection strategy and cross-selection method on long-term genetic gain.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Genomic Predicted cross performance: a tool for optimizing parental combinations in breeding programs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study on Imputed Genotypes of 180 Eurasian SoybeanPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Soybean genomics research community strategic plan: A vision for 2024-2028.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Advances in genomic tools for plant breeding: harnessing DNA molecular markers, genomic selection, and genome editing.Biological research · 2024Review
- Harnessing Multi-Omics Strategies and Bioinformatics Innovations for Advancing Soybean Improvement: A Comprehensive Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Genomic predictions of genetic variances and correlations among traits for breeding crosses in soybean.Heredity · 2024Article
- Development and implementation of nested single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assays for breeding and genetic research applications.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Genetic mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture controlling slow canopy wilting in soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Salinity stress tolerance prediction for biomass-related traits in maize (Zea mays L.) using genome-wide markers.The plant genome · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving yield is a primary soybean breeding goal, as yield is the main determinant of soybean's profitability. Within the breeding process, selection of cross combinations is one of most important elements. Cross prediction will assist soybean breeders in identifying the best cross combinations among parental genotypes prior to crossing, increasing genetic gain and breeding efficiency. In this study optimal cross selection methods were created and applied in soybean and validated using historical data from the University of Georgia soybean breeding program, under multiple training set compositions and marker densities utilizing multiple genomic selection models for marker evaluation. Plant materials consisted of 702 advanced breeding lines evaluated in multiple environments and genotyped using SoySNP6k BeadChips. An additional marker set, the SoySNP3k marker set, was tested in this study as well. Optimal cross selection methods were used to predict the yield of 42 previously made crosses and compared to the performance of the cross's offspring in replicated field trials. The best prediction accuracy was obtained when using Extended Genomic BLUP with the SoySNP6k marker set, consisting of 3,762 polymorphic markers, with an accuracy of 0.56 with a training set maximally related to the crosses predicted and 0.4 in a training set with minimized relatedness to predicted crosses. Prediction accuracy was most significantly impacted by training set relatedness to the predicted crosses, marker density, and the genomic model used to predict marker effects. The usefulness criterion selected had an impact on prediction accuracy within training sets with low relatedness to the crosses predicted. Optimal cross prediction provides a useful method that assists plant breeders in selecting crosses in soybean breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.