Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234940›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2023

Surgical method for critical sized cranial defects in rat cranium.

Sedat Odabas, Burak Derkuş, İbrahim Vargel, Altughan Cahit Vural

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sedat OdabasAnkara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory (bteLAB), Turkey.
Burak DerkuşInterdisciplinary Research Unit for Advanced Materials (INTRAM), Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
İbrahim VargelHacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Altughan Cahit VuralHarbiye Mah. Abdi İpekci Cad. 3/3 Şişli, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial tissue models are a widely used model to show the bone repair and the regeneration ability of candidate biomaterials for tissue engineering purposes. Until now, efficacy studies of different biomaterials for calvarial defect bone regeneration have been reported, generally in small animal models. This paper offers a versatile, reliable, and reproducible surgical method for creating a critical-sized cranial defect in rats including critical steps and tried-and-tested tips. The method proposed here,•Shows a general procedure for in vivo cranial models.•Provide an insight to restore bone tissue repair that may be used in combination with several tissue engineering strategies•Is a crucial technique that may guide in vivo bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Bone tissue engineeringCraniumCreating a critical sized bone defect in rat modelCritical size

Identifiers

PMID37234940
PMCPMC10205777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.