Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234863›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2023

Walk with ease for knee osteoarthritis: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Zoe E Zimmerman, Rebecca J Cleveland, Aleksandra M Kostic, Valia P Leifer, Serena E Weisner, Kelli D Allen, Yvonne M Golightly, Heather Welch, Melissa Dale, Stephen P Messier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zoe E ZimmermanPolicy and Innovation EValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rebecca J ClevelandThurston Arthritis Research Center; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Aleksandra M KosticPolicy and Innovation EValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Valia P LeiferPolicy and Innovation EValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Serena E WeisnerThurston Arthritis Research Center; Osteoarthritis Action Alliance, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kelli D AllenDurham VA Health Care System, Durham, USA.
Yvonne M GolightlyCollege of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Heather WelchMontana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA.
Melissa DaleMontana Department of Public Health and Human Services, Helena, MT, USA.
Stephen P MessierJ.B. Snow Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
David J HunterSydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney and Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Jeffrey N KatzPolicy and Innovation EValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Leigh F CallahanThurston Arthritis Research Center Departments of Medicine and Orthopaedics, Osteoarthritis Action Alliance, Dept. of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Elena LosinaPolicy and Innovation EValuation in Orthopaedic Treatments (PIVOT) Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Walk With Ease (WWE) program was developed by the Arthritis Foundation to help people with arthritis learn to exercise safely and improve arthritis symptoms. We sought to establish the value of the WWE program. Methods: We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model, a widely published and validated computer simulation of knee osteoarthritis (OA), to assess the cost-effectiveness of WWE in knee OA. We derived model inputs using data from a workplace wellness initiative in Montana that offered WWE to state employees. Our primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs over a 2-year period, which we used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The base case analysis was restricted to subjects who were inactive or insufficiently active (<180 ​min/week of PA) at baseline. We performed scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to determine the impact of uncertainty in model parameters on our results. Results: In the base case analysis, adding WWE to usual care resulted in an ICER of $47,900/QALY. When the program was offered without preselection by baseline activity level, the ICER for WWE ​+ ​usual care was estimated at $83,400/QALY. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that WWE offered to inactive or insufficiently active individuals has a 52% chance of having an ICER <$50,000/QALY. Conclusion: The WWE program offers good value for inactive/insufficiently active individuals. Payers may consider including such a program to increase physical activity in individuals with knee OA.

Indexed as

Cost-effectivenessExerciseKnee osteoarthritisPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID37234863
PMCPMC10206185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.