Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234847›Full record

ArticleBiophysics and physicobiology2023

Revisiting oxytocin generation in keratinocytes.

Kanta Fujimoto, Kosuke Inada, Kotaro Oka, Etsuro Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics and physicobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kanta FujimotoDepartment of Biology, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.
Kosuke InadaDepartment of Biology, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.
Kotaro OkaDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8522, Japan.
Etsuro ItoDepartment of Biology, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo 162-8480, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some evidence suggests that oxytocin, which is a neuropeptide conventionally thought to be synthesized in the hypothalamus and released by the posterior pituitary, is generated in peripheral keratinocytes, but the details are lacking and the mRNA analysis is further required. Oxytocin and neurophysin I are generated together as cleavage products after splitting the precursor molecule, preprooxyphysin. To confirm that oxytocin and neurophysin I are also generated in the peripheral keratinocytes, it must first be clarified that these molecules contained in peripheral keratinocytes did not originate in the posterior pituitary gland and then the expression of oxytocin and neurophysin I mRNAs must be established in keratinocytes. Therefore, we attempted to quantify preprooxyphysin mRNA in keratinocytes using various primers. Using real-time PCR, we observed that the mRNAs of both oxytocin and neurophysin I were located in keratinocytes. However, the mRNA amounts of oxytocin, neurophysin I, and preprooxyphysin were too small to confirm their co-existence in keratinocytes. Thus, we had to further determine whether the PCR-amplified sequence was identical to preprooxyphysin. The PCR products analyzed by DNA sequencing were identical to preprooxyphysin, finally determining the co-existence of both oxytocin and neurophysin I mRNAs in keratinocytes. In addition, the immunocytochemical experiments showed that oxytocin and neurophysin I proteins were located in keratinocytes. These results of the present study provided further support indicating that oxytocin and neurophysin I are generated in peripheral keratinocytes.

Indexed as

immunocytochemistryneurophysin Iperipherypreprooxyphysinreal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID37234847
PMCPMC10205573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.