Article in ZooKeys, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Hiroki KiseGeological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4099-6469
Miyuki NishijimaGeological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba Japan.
Akira IguchiGeological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8894-1977
Junpei MinatoyaJapan Organization for Metals and Energy Security (JOGMEC), 2-10-1 Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security Minato-ku Japan.
Hiroyuki YokookaInstitute of Environmental Ecology, IDEA Consultants, Inc., 1334-5 Riemon, Yaizu-shi, Shizuoka 421-0212, Japan Institute of Environmental Ecology, IDEA Consultants, Inc. Yaizu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4486-3524
Yuji IseKuroshio Biological Research Foundation, 560 Nishidomari, Otsuki, Hata, Kochi 788-0333, Japan Kuroshio Biological Research Foundation Otsuki Japan.
Atsushi SuzukiGeological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), AIST Tsukuba Central 7, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8567, Japan Geological Survey of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba Japan.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Symbiotic associations between zoantharians and sponges can be divided into two groups: those that associate with Demospongiae and those that associate with Hexactinellida.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
A new hexactinellid-sponge-associated zoantharian (Porifera, Hexasterophora) from the northwestern Pacific Ocean. · full record | OpenQuestion