ArticleSustainable computing : informatics and systems2023
IoT-based Edge Computing (IoTEC) for Improved Environmental Monitoring.
Article in Sustainable computing : informatics and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MANNA-VISW: A Low-Cost Multimodal Autonomous Platform for Environmental and Ecosystem Recovery Monitoring in Disconnected Post-Disaster Scenarios.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radon Exposure Assessment: IoT-Embedded Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microalgae-based bioremediation of refractory pollutants: an approach towards environmental sustainability.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research considered several applications of a coupled Internet of Things sensor network with Edge Computing (IoTEC) for improved environmental monitoring. Two pilot applications, covering environmental monitoring of vapor intrusion and system performance of wastewater-based algae cultivation, were designed to compare data latency, energy consumption, and economic cost between the IoTEC approach and the conventional sensor monitoring method. The results show that the IoTEC monitoring approach, compared with conventional IoT sensor networks, could significantly reduce data latency by 13%, and the amount of data transmission decreased by an average of 50%. In addition, the IoTEC method can increase the duration of power supply by 130%. Collectively, these improvements could lead to a compelling cost reduction of 55% - 82% per year for monitoring vapor intrusion at five houses, with more houses leading to more significant savings. Additionally, our results demonstrate the feasibility of deploying machine learning tools at edge servers for more advanced data processing and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.