ArticleArab journal of urology2023
Hydrodissection performed safely with an injection catheter during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To facilitate nerve preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP), hydrodissection (HD) using an injection catheter was performed. HD during RP is a nerve-sparing technique in which an epinephrine solution is injected into the lateral prostatic fascia to separate it from the prostatic capsule. Although the beneficial effects of HD on postoperative sexual function have been reported, HD has rarely been used in robot-assisted RP. The primary reason may be the potential benefits of robotic surgery, such as less bleeding, magnified surgical view, and fine movement of instruments; another possible reason is the difficulty of handling sharp needles in a narrow intra-abdominal surgical space of robot-assisted RP. For safe fluid injection, we performed HD using an injection catheter - commonly used for endoscopic upper gastrointestinal hemostasis - during robot-assisted RP. The required time to accomplish HD and the safety of the procedure were examined in 15 HD of 11 patients. Approximately 2 minutes (median, 118 seconds; interquartile range, 106-174 seconds) were needed for HD using the injection catheter. All patients had no complications, such as injuries to the intestine, vessels, or other organs. Postoperative bleeding did not occur in any patients. HD with an injection catheter enables surgeons to perform simple and safe nerve preservation during robot-assisted RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.