Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234662›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

How can proximal sensors help decision-making in grape production?

Tamás Mizik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tamás MizikDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Sustainable Development, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision viticulture (PV) aims at achieving greater profit in a more sustainable way through improved resource use efficiency and greater production. PV is based on reliable data provided by different sensors. This study aims to identify the role of proximal sensors in the decision support of PV. During the selection process, 53 of 366 articles identified were relevant for the study. These articles are classified into four groups: management zone delineation (27 articles), disease/pest prevention (11 articles), water management (11 articles), and better grape quality (5 articles). Differentiation between heterogeneous management zones is the basis for site-specific actions. The most important data that sensors provide for this are climatic and soil information. This makes it possible to predict harvesting time or identify areas for plantations. The recognition and prevention of diseases/pests are of crucial importance. Combined platforms/systems provide a good option without any compatibility problems, while variable rate spraying makes pesticide use much lower. Vine water status is the key to water management. Soil moisture and weather data can provide good insight; however, leaf water potential and canopy temperature are also used for better measurement. Although vine irrigation systems are expensive, the price premium of high-quality berries compensates for this because grape quality is closely related to its price.

Indexed as

Disease/pest preventionManagement zone delineationPrecision viticultureProximal sensorsVariable rate sprayingWater management

Identifiers

PMID37234662
PMCPMC10208820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.