ArticleHeliyon2023
Predicting facility-based delivery in Zanzibar: The vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data science and artificial intelligence for maternal, newborn and child health: scoping review and thematic analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Predicting antiretroviral therapy adherence status of adult HIV-positive patients using machine-learning Northwest, Ethiopia, 2025.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Predicting place of delivery choice among childbearing women in East Africa: a comparative analysis of advanced machine learning techniques.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community health worker (CHW)-led maternal health programs have contributed to increased facility-based deliveries and decreased maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. The recent adoption of mobile devices in these programs provides an opportunity for real-time implementation of machine learning predictive models to identify women most at risk for home-based delivery. However, it is possible that falsified data could be entered into the model to get a specific prediction result - known as an "adversarial attack". The goal of this paper is to evaluate the algorithm's vulnerability to adversarial attacks. Methods: The dataset used in this research is from the Results: Manipulating input variables affected prediction results. The variable with the greatest vulnerability was previous delivery location, with 55.65% of predicted classifications changing when applying adversarial attacks from previously delivered at a facility to previously delivered at home, and 37.63% of predicted classifications changing when applying adversarial attacks from previously delivered at home to previously delivered at a facility. Conclusion: This paper investigates the vulnerability of an algorithm to predict facility-based delivery when facing adversarial attacks. By understanding the effect of adversarial attacks, programs can implement data monitoring strategies to assess for and deter these manipulations. Ensuring fidelity in algorithm deployment secures that CHWs target those women who are actually at high risk of delivering at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.