Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37234503›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

A boost in self-esteem after positive social evaluation predicts social and non-social learning.

Charlotte van Schie, Jennifer L Cook, Bernet Elzinga, Verena Ly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte van SchieDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0631-3289
Jennifer L CookSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-8667
Bernet ElzingaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8917-7368
Verena LyDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-3065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluctuations in self-esteem resulting from social acceptance and rejection could guide social behaviour by putting us in a state that is more or less open to social experiences. However, it remains unclear whether social acceptance and rejection may shape learning from social information depending on individual differences in self-esteem changes. Here we used a social feedback paradigm to manipulate social acceptance and rejection in a between-subjects design. Subsequently, we administered a behavioural task that enables the assessment of how well individuals learn on the basis of own experiences versus social information. Participants receiving positive (

Indexed as

self-esteemself-verificationsocial acceptancesocial learningsocial rejection

Identifiers

PMID37234503
PMCPMC10206450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.